Post-summit survey

Submitted by admin on Mon, 10/10/2016 - 20:34

Please select your role in the summit: *

Presenter/Workshop Facilitator

Volunteer

Participant

1. Please indicate your overall satisfaction with this summit: *

Very satisfied

Somewhat satisfied

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Somewhat dissastisfied

Very dissatisfied

2. What where the most meaningful/valuable parts of the summit?

3. What were the least meaningful/valuable parts of the summit?

4. How would you rate the following items? *

	Excellent	Very good	Good	Fair	Poor	N/A
Relevance of conference contents *	Relevance of conference contents - Excellent	Relevance of conference contents - Very good	Relevance of conference contents - Good	Relevance of conference contents - Fair	Relevance of conference contents - Poor	Relevance of conference contents - N/A
Providing a forum for exchange of information with other participants *	Providing a forum for exchange of information with other participants - Excellent	Providing a forum for exchange of information with other participants - Very good	Providing a forum for exchange of information with other participants - Good	Providing a forum for exchange of information with other participants - Fair	Providing a forum for exchange of information with other participants - Poor	Providing a forum for exchange of information with other participants - N/A
Adherence to the Safe Space Policy *	Adherence to the Safe Space Policy - Excellent	Adherence to the Safe Space Policy - Very good	Adherence to the Safe Space Policy - Good	Adherence to the Safe Space Policy - Fair	Adherence to the Safe Space Policy - Poor	Adherence to the Safe Space Policy - N/A
Supporting diversity and inclusion *	Supporting diversity and inclusion - Excellent	Supporting diversity and inclusion - Very good	Supporting diversity and inclusion - Good	Supporting diversity and inclusion - Fair	Supporting diversity and inclusion - Poor	Supporting diversity and inclusion - N/A
Quality of presentations *	Quality of presentations - Excellent	Quality of presentations - Very good	Quality of presentations - Good	Quality of presentations - Fair	Quality of presentations - Poor	Quality of presentations - N/A
Information available online *	Information available online - Excellent	Information available online - Very good	Information available online - Good	Information available online - Fair	Information available online - Poor	Information available online - N/A
Registration process *	Registration process - Excellent	Registration process - Very good	Registration process - Good	Registration process - Fair	Registration process - Poor	Registration process - N/A
Quality of material circulated by the organizers *	Quality of material circulated by the organizers - Excellent	Quality of material circulated by the organizers - Very good	Quality of material circulated by the organizers - Good	Quality of material circulated by the organizers - Fair	Quality of material circulated by the organizers - Poor	Quality of material circulated by the organizers - N/A
Conference venue/facilities *	Conference venue/facilities - Excellent	Conference venue/facilities - Very good	Conference venue/facilities - Good	Conference venue/facilities - Fair	Conference venue/facilities - Poor	Conference venue/facilities - N/A
Organizational arrangements for and during the event *	Organizational arrangements for and during the event - Excellent	Organizational arrangements for and during the event - Very good	Organizational arrangements for and during the event - Good	Organizational arrangements for and during the event - Fair	Organizational arrangements for and during the event - Poor	Organizational arrangements for and during the event - N/A
Dates of the conference *	Dates of the conference - Excellent	Dates of the conference - Very good	Dates of the conference - Good	Dates of the conference - Fair	Dates of the conference - Poor	Dates of the conference - N/A
Time allotted for sessions *	Time allotted for sessions - Excellent	Time allotted for sessions - Very good	Time allotted for sessions - Good	Time allotted for sessions - Fair	Time allotted for sessions - Poor	Time allotted for sessions - N/A

*** Presenters/Workshop Facilitators: How would you rate the following items?

	Very Satisfied	Somewhat Satisfied	Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied	Somewhat dissatisfied	Very dissatisfied
Process for submitting a proposal	Process for submitting a proposal - Very Satisfied	Process for submitting a proposal - Somewhat Satisfied	Process for submitting a proposal - Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied	Process for submitting a proposal - Somewhat dissatisfied	Process for submitting a proposal - Very dissatisfied
Schedule for your session	Schedule for your session - Very Satisfied	Schedule for your session - Somewhat Satisfied	Schedule for your session - Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied	Schedule for your session - Somewhat dissatisfied	Schedule for your session - Very dissatisfied
Time allotted for your session	Time allotted for your session - Very Satisfied	Time allotted for your session - Somewhat Satisfied	Time allotted for your session - Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied	Time allotted for your session - Somewhat dissatisfied	Time allotted for your session - Very dissatisfied
Reaching your target audience	Reaching your target audience - Very Satisfied	Reaching your target audience - Somewhat Satisfied	Reaching your target audience - Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied	Reaching your target audience - Somewhat dissatisfied	Reaching your target audience - Very dissatisfied

5. What topic(s) or theme(s) you would like to be addressed at next Libre Learn Lab summit? *

6. San Francisco or Miami are potential candidates to hold the next Libre Learn Lab Summit in 2017. How satisfied are you with these locations? *

7. How did you find out about Libre Learn Lab? *

Name (optional)

Email address (optional)

Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey.

We will use the responses collected to make Libre Learn Lab even better next year.

User menu

Post-summit survey